aptom 2007-10-26 07:00
头疼,请教:15k左右的耳机系统音原选择
现在预想了两套方案:
1/ dac1 usb接3000左右的转盘搭配 (觉得dac1usb还可以用在电脑上灵活性比较高)
2/ 单独买一个13k左右的CDP (线的烦恼可以少一些,简单明了)
剩下的钱上电源和线
转盘以后可以换,上了解码应该是不会换了,请问怎么选好?
nadesicozhao 2007-10-27 21:21
13K全新的CD?
还不如一个Dell本子用电池模式+DAC-1U的效果
如果本子装vista,那差距更大;P
GUOLIANG_82 2007-10-27 22:13
First up was the Benchmark DAC 1 ($975), which John Marks raved about in his July 2003 column and which I had enthused over in May 2004. For the comparisons, I fed the Benchmark from the Arcam's S/PDIF output, using DH Labs' excellent Silver Sonic cable fitted with an RCA plug on the source end and a BNC jack on the other. Levels were matched to within 0.1dB at 1kHz using the Mark Levinson preamp's input level-offset capability. I used the Benchmark's balanced outputs, which I think offer a better-focused presentation than from its unbalanced jacks.
Both Arcam and Benchmark sounded similar when it came to tonal balance and soundstaging precision. However, the standalone processor's presentation was slightly more robust. The flute in my Mozart Quartet recording on the Editor's Choice CD (Stereophile STPH016-2) stood a little closer to the front of the stage of Santa Fe's St. Francis Auditorium. Which is correct? Even though I made the recording, both were believable presentations. I preferred whichever one I was listening to at the moment.
The situation was the same on the Mozart Clarinet Quintet movement that follows: the clarinet sounded fuller via the Benchmark, more set back but better defined in space via the Arcam. Over a long series of comparisons, I think I ended up preferring the Benchmark, but I can imagine this preference being reversed if I experimented with cables. (Replacing the AudioQuest Cheetahs I was using for the Benchmark with plain-Jane balanced mike cables dramatically reduced the differences between the two presentations.)
aptom 2007-10-28 04:04
我上个dac1u,转盘就用我现在的君子木星,再连上emp,效果能比1万5至2万左右的CDP好吗?
dac1u音频线和电源线有啥经济点的选择?有必要改保险丝吗?
我的本本是vista的,到时候会试下的,呵呵:)
nadesicozhao 2007-10-28 11:38
说实话
君子木星的转盘就不要期待什么了
本子什么牌子
aptom 2007-10-28 11:44
木星的转盘不好啊:(
本子是acer和hp的,还有个ibm不过是xp的系统
nadesicozhao 2007-10-29 11:37
acer不要抱希望
hp可以听听看
木星很大部分的声音是转盘造成的
连了DAC-1还是很多木星的声音,有人还会觉得不如木星自己的解码声音自然
DAC-1对转盘的要求就是相位自然,声音平衡,最好清淡点,贵气点
ellennet 2007-10-30 11:33
CEC的转盘怎么样?
小白 2007-10-30 12:17
适合DAC1的转盘,CEC,TEAC/ESOTERIC,SONY,都算. 日系转盘一般都都比较清淡.
nadesicozhao 2007-10-30 17:26
对DAC-1来说,sony的够呛
宁愿用Denon的
kell 2007-10-30 21:01
CEC还可以,他家的低档、高档都值得一用,特别是低档的51,性价比超好、用过了才知道好!比较适合胆解码。
sygqy 2007-10-31 09:23
CEC 51 最好别用, 记得有个XD配老版DAC1,数字同轴信号锁不住