版主
俱乐部理事
- 积分
- 3761
- 注册时间
- 2001-11-21
  
|
楼主 |
发表于 2009-7-30 13:58:27
|
显示全部楼层
容许我扯开去说一点:
2008年1月美国CES上有一个房间是<华尔街日报>包下的,目的是通过盲听实验来验证几个存在争议的问题,包括线材有无影响在内. 我当时也去了那个房间,还拍了照,写在我的CES报道帖里.
华尔街日报的人员用了一根2000美金的怪兽Sigma Retro Gold喇叭线,和一根五金店买来的普通喇叭线,接驳好系统,给来到这个房间的人盲听对比. 结果是: 61%的人喜欢那根贵的怪兽喇叭线. 当然,这是一个统计学的结果. 说明参加测试的人有的能分辨,有的不能,但统计学的结论是,似乎贵的那根线稍稍更受欢迎些.
在华尔街日报最后写的文章里,有一句话必须注意到,我加了黑体字. "令我吃惊的是,参加展会的人中有些最厉害的角色——比如Stereophile杂志的John Atkinson和Michael Fremer——轻易地听出了哪根喇叭线贵."
部分原文(摘自报道):
Using two identical CD players, I tested a $2,000, eight-foot pair of Sigma Retro Gold cables from Monster Cable, which are as thick as your thumb, against 14-gauge, hardware-store speaker cable. Many audiophiles say they are equally good. I couldn't hear a difference and was a wee bit suspicious that anyone else could. But of the 39 people who took this test, 61% said they preferred the expensive cable.
That may not be much of a margin for two products with such drastically different prices, but I was struck by how the best-informed people at the show -- like John Atkinson and Michael Fremer of Stereophile Magazine -- easily picked the expensive cable.
Its sound was described as "richer," "crisper" and "more coherent." Like some wines, come to think of it.
我相信华尔街日报的人写下这句话,不是收了John Atkinson和Michael Fremer的贿赂,或者瞎写的. 确实,资深的,听音经验丰富的人是不难分辨的,而普罗大众就很难说了. 问题是,只要有人能分辨,就可以说明"确实是有区别的". 这种区别也是微妙的,任何时候都不可能期望从菜场拉10个人过来都能分辨.
所以我说,如果James Randy先生真的愚蠢到为了盲听喇叭线而设立100万美金悬赏,他注定要破产的. |
|
发表于 2009-7-30 13:31:46
