强烈建议白版吃螃蟹测试OPPO BDP-83 bd player

audiophile

交易区新帖推荐

比较一下STEREOPHILE在2009年4月同样在音源部分中的A级，不是A+级的榜单对Marantz SA8001：$900的评价：The two-channel-only SA8001 use a 24-bit/192kHz upsampling design based on a Cirrus Logic 4397 chip, and played SACD, CD, CD-R, and CD-RW without a hiccup. "It's a solid, unpretentious, reliable player that does what it's supposed to do at a reasonable cost," praised Jim Austin. While the SA8001's CD playback was "about as good as 'Red Book' gets," SACD performance was marked by a lovely, naturalness, and ease." The other JA, too, was impressed: "It may be affordably priced, but the Marantz SA8001''s meaured performance is beyond reproadch." (Vol.30 No.10 WWW)
榜单前言中对A、B、C、D、K分级的标准中对A+和A级的描述：With Super Audio CD, 24/96 DAD, and DVD-A Audio now available, we have created a new Class, A+, for the best performance in those digital categories. Class A now represents the best that can be obtained from the conventional 16/44.1 CD medium.
感觉应该针对不同的片源（软体），对应不同的级别，来参考这份榜单。

audiophile

原帖由 21940528 于 2009-11-2 17:07 发表
楼上真及时，省掉我不少劳动量

以前一直潜水 ，终于有机会做点打字工作了

大手

还不如买个PS3

nadesicozhao

好多人都不看定语的

晓月圆舞曲

音质比他的mp3播放器好

flymemory

不过看起来，这个东西作为蓝光播放机，性价比应该是不错了

htt613613

白版难道是专业螃蟹试吃员？

wangfan

我也不相信蓝光影碟机的HIFI性多高。

audiophile

原帖由 花宝宝 于 2009-11-2 18:02 发表
ls的哥哥能简单翻译一下么？

文章太长了，我就翻一点我用红色标注的吧，这些应该可以表明该机的级别了。在小白面前舞大刀了  
14楼：
used through the HDMI output, as a transport, it pops up to A+ 通过HDMI输出端口播放，它迸发出高达A+级的实力------“通过HDMI输出端口播放”，这个很重要

My review sample was officially a beta unit—the firmware had not yet been finalized (is it ever?)我用来评价的样机是Oppo公司提供的官方测试版本，固件尚未最终定案（现在是否定案了呢？）。------注意，杂志用的是公司特地送去的样机，后文主要是表述由于固件未升级，所以有些如DVD-A的播放会碰到问题。但该样机的表现是否和之后市场上的产品一致，存疑。

The analog output of the DV-980H was usable, but not in the class of the comparably featured Pioneer DV-58. The BDP-83 is in that class.DV-980H的模拟输出和Pioneer DV-58不在一个级别，不过BDP-83和Pioneer DV-58在一个级别上。------Pioneer DV-58AV在榜单的B级上。

However, comparing the Oppo's playing of two-channel SACDs with that of the Sony SCD-XA5400ES, I could hear that the Oppo can't compete with the better dedicated players. 然而，用Oppo来播放两声道的SACD同Sony SCD-XA5400ES比较，在我听来Oppo不能和更高级的专用SACD机一竞高下。------Sony SCD-XA5400ES在榜单的A+级上。

Using the Oppo's HDMI output for audio, the gap in performance between the BDP-83 and its predecessors, or the Sony, narrowed but remained. 使用Oppo的HDMI端口输出听音，BDP-83的表现，和它的前任或SONY比，差距非常小，但还是有的。

Via its analog outputs, the BDP-83 was nearly in the class of the Denon DVD-3800BDCI Blu-ray player. I couldn't A/B the two players, but I felt a bit more relaxed with the Denon. 通过模拟输出，BDP-83非常接近于Denon DVD-3800BDCI Blu-ray所处的那个级别。我没有A/B对比两台机器，不过，我认为Denon的声音让我更舒适些。------Denon DVD-3800B DCI Blu-ray player在榜单的A级上，对它的评价是“Class B for CD playback but Kal was swept away by the Denon's sound with high-resolution Blu-ray music recordings:"It simply made every disc sound superb," he wrote, hence the Class A rating for hi-rez media.(Vol.32 No.1 WWW）”Denon DVD-3800B DCI Blu-ray player播放的CD表现应该在B级这个级别，不过Kal被Denon播放的高解析规格的蓝光录音碟片的声音迷倒了，Kal写道“它能让每一种碟片的声音表现一流”，所以该机对高解析规格的碟片（软体）表现应归在A级。------有趣吗？“the Class A rating for hi-rez media ”，不是A+级哦，看来高解析规格的碟片放出来的声音，也有归在A级的。

综上所述，从《STEREOPHILE》的评价看，Oppo BDP-83 Blu-ray player: $499播放高解析规格的碟片可以归在A+级，不过可能比高级专用的SACD机稍逊一筹；播放CD的话就只能归在B级了。

翻译真累人，看来“宁读十篇，不翻一篇”此言不假。

16楼的文字翻译，我打算另外开个帖子http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/viewthread.php?tid=132187&page=1&extra=page%3D1。

[ 本帖最后由 audiophile 于 2009-11-4 15:20 编辑 ]

audiophile

借了528的光，注明榜单出处：http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/thread-131997-1-2.html

ddeell72

我顶OPPO，坚决狂顶

xinxin1009

这种东西还是沉了的好 声音好不过国产diy碟机。。

divinegod

diy碟机还是算了吧，大都diy耳放还整不明白