|
|
发表于 2016-2-19 10:59:10
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 njhifi 于 2016-2-19 11:08 编辑
参考一下外网的评价，做个搬运工把它搬过来：
I´ve been using the c55 for about three months now. First I borrowed them from a good friend and compared them to my old M-Audio speakers. Then I went to the Thomann-Store (yes i´ve actually been there) and compared them to several other loudspeakers in the pricerange around 800
奇怪，贴不完整，贴下面这部分看看是否可以，这是主要内容了。
At Thomann I compared them to the c5 tinys, the neumann kh 120, the focal solo 6 be and the dynaudio bm6 MKIII. I also heared the Neumann kh 310.
My impression was as follows (My test was around two hours long and it is already two weeks ago so I recall just from memory and everything is absolutely subjective):
KH 120: very impressive bass for the size, but a little boomy around 200hz and maybe around 800
Focal solo 6be: a little underwelming as they have nice lower mids but lack some bass and are kind of dull in the highend, maybe the examples at the store did not have the "burn in time" that everybody always speaks about but I did not whant to mess around with that matter, they clearly lost in that comperisson
dynaudio bm6 MKIII: a little muddy all over the place and did not translate the area around 8k very well, to me they where a little unimpressive
c5 tiny: I liked the midrange much better than the midrange of the kh 120, especially the upper mids but they sounded literally a little tiny, although they are basically the upper half of the c55 they lack a lot in the bass and are not as clear as the c55 overall
neumann kh 310: I did not listen too much into the big neumanns because they where far beyond my buget but my impression was that they where most compareble to the c55 in the test. As far as I remember they sounded more expansiv, clearer at 500hz and above and though the stereo image of the c55 (and c5) is very impressive, the kh 310 where a lot better there too.
Always remember: These are just my impressions, yours may vary a lot 
|
|
楼主
