|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-8-17 17:01:20
|
显示全部楼层
I'd be interested in hearing the dual-active configuration, but I can't see how it would make a difference aside from having a signal with twice the magnitude.
Plus, they would have to be driven from a source with very low (near zero) output impedance.
The problem with using the DAC1 for such an application is the output drivers are designed to drive a line input device, hence the 60-ohm output impedance. With headphones, this output impedance will cause the damping factor to drop significantly, causing ringing, overshoot, and all sorts of distortion based on driver resonances. Let me elaborate on this further...
Damping factor is a ratio of [load impedance vs. source impedance]. In the case of the HPA2, the output (source) impedance is less then 0.11 ohms. Therefore, the damping factor with 300-ohm headphones will be near 3000.
The damping factor with a 30-ohm output impedance and 300-ohm headphones will be 10. The damping factor with 60-ohm outputs and 300-ohm headphones will be near 5.
As you can see, we lose the tight control over the drivers which is essential for the reactive load which a speaker presents.
Another problem with a significant (>1-ohm) source impedance: the headphones have frequency-dependant resistance. Therefore, the voltage divider that is created between the source impedance and the load impedance is now a frequency-dependent voltage divider. This means the frequency response is going to be anything but flat.
I would be hesitant to use this type of configuration. In fact, I don't recommend driving headphones with any source with an output impedance >1 ohm to drive headphones at all.
With that being said, it will not hurt the DAC1 to do this, so feel free to experiment with this setup without worrying about causing any damage. My philosophy is...if it sounds good to you...go for it!
However, don't evaluate the quality of the DAC1 based on driving headphones with the XLR outputs.
======================================================================
BENCHMARK的答复2 |
|