版主
俱乐部理事

- 积分
- 3771
- 注册时间
- 2001-11-21
  
|
发表于 2008-2-23 20:52:52
|
显示全部楼层
在这篇SOUNDSTAGE对RP5.1的评论文章里,非常难得地读到了一段把RP5.1和美国Single Power的入门级耳放PPX3(6SN7版)进行A/B对比的内容. 译出如下:
首先注意到的是,RP5.1在高频的延伸和空气感方面比PPX3略有胜出. 不仅听感上延伸更好,另外高频也更有光彩. 我注意到的第二件事是,细节量以及乐器的分离度,也是RP5.1更佳. 它更好地反映出音源的细节,乐器之间的分隔也更好. 每个乐器,每个音符都占有自己的一席之地,声音听起来不混不乱. 两台耳放的中频呈现方式也略有区别. RP5.1的中频更中性一些,这也许是它的胆石混合结构带来的结果,而纯胆设计的PPX3中频略带一些暖意. 如果说到低频的表现,PPX3的低频重量感更多一些,向下延伸比RP5.1更多一些.
(原文: To get a grasp on how good this amp was, I added the $549 SinglePower Audio PPX3-6SN7 to my system. During A/B comparisons I found that a couple of things stood out right away. The first was that the RP5.1 had a bit of an edge in terms of high-end extension and air. Not only was its sound more extended, but there was more sparkle to the highs. The second thing I noticed was the amount of detail and the instrumental separation. With the RP5.1 you get a little more detail from your source, and there’s more separation between instruments. Each instrument and note occupies its own space, making things less congested when listening to the RP5.1 There is also a slight difference in how each amp presents the midrange. The RP5.1 has a slightly more neutral midrange. This is probably due to its hybrid design versus that of the pure-tube circuit in the PPX3-6SN7, which gives a slight touch of warmth to its mids. When it came to the bass, the PPX3-6SN7 carries a little more weight and has a little more extension than the RP5.1.)
[ 本帖最后由 小白 于 2008-2-23 20:54 编辑 ] |
-
-
|